August 19, 2014 | Online

Gawker revamps comments section due to graphic porn

Jezebel fights porn trollsOn Friday, Gawker Media announced that it will now review all user comments before they are posted.
 
The decision was made after Gawker-owned site Jezebel, a feminist blog, complained that its parent company was not doing enough to deal with the issue of "violent pornography" and "gory images of bloody injuries" that were being uploaded by commenters on a daily basis.
 
"This practice is profoundly upsetting to our commenters who have the misfortune of starting their day with some excessively violent images, to casual readers who drop by to skim Jezebel with their morning coffee only to see hard core pornography at the bottom of a post about Michelle Obama, and especially to the staff, who are the only ones capable of removing the comments and are thus, by default, now required to view and interact with violent pornography and gore as part of our jobs," Jezebel staff wrote on their site. "None of us are paid enough to deal with this on a daily basis."
 
Gawker's publishing platform, Kinja, was designed to make it easy for users to comment on stories and provide tips to Gawker's editors while remaining anonymous. It is considered one of the main reasons the site has become so successful. 
 
"Gawker's leadership is prioritizing theoretical anonymous tipsters over a very real and immediate threat to the mental health of Jezebel's staff and readers," Jezebel editors claimed.
 
After Jezebel's complaint went public, Gawker editor-in-chief Max Read announced that comments will now require approval. The new policy to review all comments before they go live affects all of Gawker Media's online properties, including Gizmodo, Lifehacker, Deadspin, Jezebel and io9.
 
Gawker Responds To Jezebel Staff Complaints ... About Violent Pornographic Comments [Business Insider]

Top | Home | About Us | Contact Us | Reviews | Galleries | News | What's Up?

BananaGuide: the gay man's guide to porn
© 2000, 2024 Untangled Web Inc.