July 20, 2011 | Sex & Society

Bottoms have small cocks

man measures penisRecently a cock-size study -- partly paid for by taxpayer money -- came to light and has conservatives up in arms. 

The research looked at whether tops or bottoms were more likely to be well endowed. According to the research, bottoms had smaller dicks than tops.

This 2009 paper was part of a group of studies that obtained $900,000 in grant money in a single year, given out by the National Institutes of Health. It is unknown how much money went directly to this specific case, although one of the students involved in the project said the funding only covered the cost to "analyse and write up" the research findings.

About 1,000 men in New York were surveyed, and given a free movie pass, for the study.

However, the sabres are being rattled. The Traditional Values Coalition drew attention to the report after reviewing how NIH grants were given out.

President of the Traditional Values Coalition, Andrea Lafferty, said: 'This country is broke and we cannot spend money on this kind of stuff. We’ve got nameless, faceless bureaucrats who thought this was a good use of taxpayer money."

Given that this was a survey rather than an actual measurement we seriously doubt the findings are accurate, making it an even bigger waste. But if they're looking for cock-measuring volunteers, we'd be more than happy to do our part. 

Fox News: Your tax dollars measure gay dong [Xtra]

US government under-fire for study linking penis size to whether gay men ‘top’ or ‘bottom’ [Pink News]

Top | Home | About Us | Contact Us | Reviews | Galleries | News | What's Up?

BananaGuide: the gay man's guide to porn
© 2000, 2024 Untangled Web Inc.